• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Alliance for Hope International

(0)Login
Login

Escape

Social iconSocial iconSocial icon

    • About Us
      • Our Team
      • Our Board
      • HOPE Rising Award
      • Lifetime Achievement Award
      • Join Our Mailing List
      • Annual Reports
      • Conference Hope Survey Reports
    • Our History
    • Training
      • Conferences and Events
      • HOPE Hub
      • Privacy Policy
      • Online Resource Library
    • Programs
    • News and Media
    • Shop Now
    • Donate
      • Check us out on Guidestar
      • Supporters
      • Conference Supporters
    • Contact Us

    • Blog
    • News & Media
    • HOPE Hub
    • CFJCN
    • SHOP Now
    • Donate
    • AFHI

    Fix Loopholes that Tilt Domestic Violence Cases in Batterers' Favor

    October 22, 2013

    Boston Globe
    Op-Ed, Marian Ryan, Middlesex District Attorney
    I write to thank you for the editorial bringing the public’s attention to two serious loopholes in Massachusetts law that thwart our ability to prosecute domestic violence offenders (“To crack down on abusers, two simple changes to law,” Sept. 30). These loopholes are the so-called “accord and satisfaction” provision, which allows abusers to pressure their victims into ending a prosecution, and the practice of treating acts of strangulation as if they were no worse than any other unpermitted touching.
    My prosecutors have seen how these loopholes protect batterers and endanger the safety of victims. Strangulation is a brutal, extraordinarily frightening, and intimate form of violence. Yet the statute most often used to prosecute these cases treats strangulation no more seriously than a slap or a shove. We hope to see legislation passed that would treat strangulation not as a misdemeanor offense, as it frequently is today, but as a felony.
    We know that domestic violence cases are about power and control — specifically, the power and control that the abuser has over the victim. While an accord and satisfaction agreement might be an equitable way to resolve a minor dispute between two equals, in the context of domestic violence, the abuser and victim are not equals. Permitting an accord in such a context takes the judgment of police, prosecutors, and community advocates out of the equation. Our proposed fix to the law would prevent an accord and satisfaction agreement in any case that involves a crime of domestic violence.
    I hope the Legislature will act quickly to pass both of these bills and strengthen our hand in the fight against domestic violence.

    Reader Interactions

    Leave a Reply Cancel reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    Primary Sidebar

    Top Articles

    • Strangulation in sex can increase risk of stroke and brain injuries, distressing study finds
    • read more »
    • Strangled Victims Need Imaging
    • read more »
    • What Parents Need to Know About the Choking Game
    • read more »
    • Choking someone is often prelude to future homicide
    • read more »
    • Strangulation and Domestic Violence Murders
    • read more »

    Join Us Now & stay informed

    • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

    our programs

    Nfjca Logo 2018 1
    Trainingiinstitute
    Cha Logo V12.28.18 2
    Justice
    Voices

    Logo Footer 501 W. Broadway, Ste A #625, San Diego, CA 92101 (888) 511-3522 | 1110 Hemphill St. Fort Worth, TX 76104
    © 2022 Alliance for HOPE International. All Rights Reserved. Design by TinyFrog Technologies.

    Login

    Lost Your Password?
    Register
    Don't have an account? Register one!
    Register an Account

    Registration confirmation will be emailed to you.